![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The good, the lovely, and the ugly
In the Bujold community, Hedda62 just posted Further Up and Further In, a Betan Survey/Narnia cross over to fill the prompt: You know all those Betan survey ships that go into wormholes and don’t come out? They go to Narnia. It's so much fun. I really enjoyed it.
In recognition of some real ugliness and other things,
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
The ugliness, more on that briefly, below, underscores how much I miss the Narnia Fanfiction Revolution community which had at its core a celebration of diversity and creativity. It was that rare thing in the Narnia fandom, a community that did not tolerate intolerance. Maybe, given that the films are over and the fandom is contracting again, there is no need for it and so its demise will pass unremarked. Still, I miss it. I know the technical skill to transfer the old site to the new server is beyond me and I really don't know anything about forum management. If anyone has any thoughts on this -- is there a need for it, if so where, who, and how -- I welcome your thoughts.
I've been trying to write but have been badly distracted. First, I managed to fall into a rabbit cage on to cement and now have bruises and cuts on both legs, knees, feet and one arm. I have been Battered by bunnies. School also started and so that is always a stressful time of year. huzzah for a long weekend.
Second, I had a unsigned, anonymous review to I love not man the less but nature more. Over the last day, I've been tinkering with a response. There's a little more here, under the cut. Please be warned -- this anon review and my discussion that follows contain horribly homophobic language bracketed by smileys. If being labeled horrible things due to sexual orientation is triggering, stop now.
Guest posted a review on I love not man the less but nature more. In that review, she [yes, I'll assume she] states:
:This was very well written, and I enjoyed the ideas behind some of the challenges. They were very symbolic and meaningful. I especially appreciated the rebirth. You are a good writer. :)
Thank you. Guest then states:
I have to say one thing, though. I wish that you had not crossed the bounds of what is right and wrong in our world so drastically, and made it seem as though in Narnia it would be good and pure, and would have Aslan's approval. Since He is a picture of Christ, and since God is a holy, unchanging God, if God says that nakedness and homosexuality are an abomination in our world, it follows that this would also remain the case in any other world He chose to create.
Just my thoughts on what you could do to stay true to Lewis' Narnia. :) I do not think that he would have agreed with you that perversion becomes acceptable if it is in another world. Surely there are other ways they could bond with their people.
Apart from the despicable assault surrounded by passive smileys and the gross presumption that the loving God I worship agrees with Guest’s hate, I explicitly state in my profile and in the story that there is a same sex pairing. And, let’s be realistic, shall we? I’ve been actively posting in the fandom since early 2009 and in that time, I have written over 800,000 words of Narnia fan fiction and I'm no slash writer. In the 22,000 words of I love not man the less, there are about 500 words at the very end where I fade to black on a multi-het-slash pairing. There's nothing else like that in the rest of my work. I love not man the less has been up for a year.
In other words, and as I’ve now amended my profile to state, Guest had a point she was going to make, she went looking for it in one of the few places she would find it in my enormous body of work, she ignored repeated disclosures and disclaimers, she did this even though she believes homosexuality is, to quote her hateful review, an “abomination” and a “perversion,” and she used my story as a platform to spread her homophobic bilge and viciously assault my other readers and would-be readers in the name of the God of Love.
In the end, that last point was the important difference between this anonymous review and the many hatemongers who have preceded it. Others have criticized me for destroying Narnia and perverting Lewis' intent. Guest went after my LGBT readers and would-be readers. I’m not interested in fighting anyone else’s battles, but Guest decided to use my story as her soapbox. Only I can defend it and the freedom readers and would-be readers should have to click on my story and not be subjected to vicious hate.
So, for the first time, I deleted a review. Fortunately, you can delete anonymous reviews on fanfiction.net. You can’t delete signed ones. If I receive homophobic hate speech in a signed review, I’ll report it for abuse and a TOS violation.
When I wrote Digory opening that badly spelled note from Mary in April 2009, I never intended to be the poster child and lightning rod for all that Guest and others condemn as wrong in the Narnia fandom.
no subject
You know (and so do I, and I am grateful for it every day) that part of the point of writing ILNMTL was to create a Narnia where everyone is accepted, loved, and encouraged to live their lives to the fullest in every way, that everyone is a creation of whatever higher power one believes in (or a creation of evolution if that is one's explanation), and that sexuality of any kind is one of the joys we are given to connect with others. What you write is beautiful; it promotes love and tolerance, and this person clearly possesses neither quality.
I will absolutely check out Songsmith's new comm, as it sounds like it could be a wonderful gathering place for all of us, and maybe some of the people who were so active in the NFFR as well.
*Hugs* to you! I am so sorry that you got hurt, as well; that seems highly unpleasant and uncomfortable. Feel better, and remember that for every awful review like this, there are so many more people who love your work.
no subject
Unfortunately the C2s are little more than a rec-list, although I am very glad to promote stories which step outside the narrow-minded constraints of the nastier elements of the fandom. It doesn't provide much in the way of a forum for discussion. In the absence (possibly temporary?) of a website-home for us, perhaps we might try to revive a Narnian LJ comm?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I'm sorry the anonymous reviewer spewed hate on your comments page. I don't think that hate and exclusion are in the spirit of Narnia (I'm not saying the books or their theology are perfect. I've been reading a deconstruction of them that I'm enjoying immensely that points out a lot of the theological problems in the books). I'm not sure one can write about Narnia without engaging with the idea of God, but I fail to see a reason to assume that God is narrow and disapproving.
I guess some people feel the need to search out things to be offended by and opportunities to be offensive. I think you did the right thing in deleting the review.
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
(If it were me and I had felt like Guest, I wouldn't even have bothered wasting my time and breath on reviewing. As the saying goes, if you have nothing nice to say...)
At any rate, I actually cheered that you deleted the comment -- I know you often state that you leave the good and bad up, but sometimes, it's really easier to just delete it and not let the words eat you up and make you feel terrible about something that was well-written and well-received by people who are more open-minded about life and religion and individual choices.
no subject
no subject
And - *huuuuuugs* - because you SHOULD NOT have to deal with this constant attack, it's ridiculous and childish and disgusting that people insist on finding something wrong with the best worldview being written in Narnia fandom, and I know it gets you down, but I'm so so glad you keep writing it, because on top of being a stellar message, it's always an awesome story, and I really do think it's important that it be there, so thoroughly and entertainingly presented, for people to see.
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
I would say more, but I can't verbalise it beyond swearwords and general ranting, which is not the right way to do so, yours of just deleting was best :)
*Hugs*
I hope your bruises heal quickly, and that you get a chance to relax this weekend!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-08-31 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)I'll again repeat my belief, rth, that this is more of a statement of an intent to defend the faith, so to speak, even if it is really tactless, hurtful, badly thought through, and executed poorly.
I very much like the thought of a NFFR2, if only that it will give me more stories to read :) :)
Doctor Dolly
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Second, if you think that nakedness is an abomination you haven't really read much of the Bible, have you? Just the popular bits? Thought so.
Third, I must say I agree with Doctor Dolly above that it reads to me like a person who has been brought up to think this way, maybe even a young person, certainly an isolated person, rather than a concerted attack. You never know how a person might stumble across a story of yours. And sadly, though I will never understand why, there are people who don't seem aware that browsers come with a back button.
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
I am looking forward to having the next couple nights (relatively & hopefully) free in order to read through the NFE. I've been reviewing the ones that I get to but am absurdly far behind.
I love the idea of the comm to collect the more diverse and accepting stories - it seems like a really good resource! Hopefully we'll be able to find another platform for discussions now that NFFR has closed down.
no subject
'what is right and wrong', 'unchanging God', 'perversion'...so much about this review gets my back up and I think you were right to delete it. 'nakedness' an 'abomination' in 'this world'? Well, I guess that reviewer must be having some kinky clothes-on sex then *head desk*. And 'true to Lewis' Narnia'? Why is it that some people miss the basic point of fanficiton, to explore what there isn't? Yeah, I'm going to leave this be before I start to rant; deleted was definitely the best response. You shouldn't have to deal with this *hugs*.
no subject
And the Christianity thing bothers me so much because I AM Christian, I like theology, I like writing a benevolent and compassionate Aslan and I like using the Narnia experience to explore ministry to the poor, the oppressed, and the despised in a post-WW2 world. To paraphrase my critics, "I'm not like THOSE people!"
And OMG LOVED the new Avengers VID you recc'd from kaydee falls!! I've watched it like a zillion times this morning. THANKS SO MUCH!
(no subject)
no subject
Also, if God is unchanging, where is the Narnian polygyny, I ask you? If it was good enough for Jacob, it's good enough for Peter Pevensie, goshdarnit!
...
Sorry, I am being flippant, but people like that really put my back up. I am so sorry you have been the target of that kind of vicious prejudice (disguised in smiles -- would that false pleasantry be akin to the devil speaking Scripture, perhaps?) and I think you made the right choice in deleting the review.
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
I've been lurking for a while on your live journal having been reading your fics on ff.net. I'm really bad at actually reviewing or taking part in comms a lot of the time, but I was moved to venture out and offer my comments following this discussion.
I'm really sorry that a beautiful, thought-provoking and loving piece of work in a body of work that is all of those things and more should be used in this way. As a Christian myself I am offended far more by those people who call themselves followers of Christ who go out of their way to spread intolerance in his name than I would ever be by your exploration of a Narnia that is as complex and challenging as real life.
I have been enjoying your work for a long time and the ideal of tolerance and inclusion that your Narnia is striving towards should, in my opinion, only be celebrated. And while I by no means imagine that I know what Lewis's opinions on some of the issues explored in your work, I feel confident that whatever thay may have been, he would never have engaged in such crass and hateful rhetoric as Guest may have supposed - I imagine without reading any of his theological works.
As well as enjoying your work, I am glad for the community of sensible, articulate and tolerant people that come together on your flist (amongst other places) and show that there are internet contributors capable of not just erudition, but reasoned discussion even with differing viewpoints, but even more so people who come and offer each other support and compassion although they may never have met. I fail to see how any loving God could disapprove.
Lily
no subject
I began TSG in part as a reaction to the intolerance I saw in the fandom and because I disagreed with its nihilistic vision of this world. In my egocentric naiveté, I hoped the story might reach a stony heart or two. In that, I think it and I have failed.
But this wonderful community has arisen and I have new and very, very good friends and I meet new ones all the time. Every now and then, I get a message from someone who thanks me for not slamming and shaming him/her. Or, I hear from someone who wasn't comfortable with what she read in 2009, but 3 years later, she returns to it, with new eyes and new maturity. And so I take heart. (And really wish I could finish a darn chapter).
no subject
I'm not at all religious, but the beauty of viewing God as a loving and benevolent deity and acting with kindness and tolerance towards others is that it is a lifestyle which is applicable to everyone and welcomes everyone. It's also a large part of why I find your work wonderful. It's full of religious awe, but it doesn't exclude me and doesn't tell me that goodness is reserved for those who fit into a particular mold.
I can't make you feel better about having your fantastic writing subjected to this sort of small-minded bullshit, but I hope I - and all of the wonderful people who've commented on this thread - can encourage you not to lose heart, and tell you that you are a good person whose work reflects this.
no subject
no subject
I have seen several things in the past four days I could fairly and without exaggeration call an abomination unto the Lord and his creation. Things that I hate to know have happened, are happening.
Homosexuality isn't one of them.
Nowhere close.
I am, as ever, so very sorry you've become such a habitual target for people who persist in thinking otherwise.
no subject
But this is part of the point, you know? Capegio was so popular in part because she wrote the "right" story" instead of one of "those" stories written by those "other" people. And then she bravely states that everything they thought about her is false because she is gay -- and I wonder how many deleted her from their favorites as a result? There is a horrible assumption by the Narnia fandom that an author who does not write that "un-Christian" yucky stuff must condemn it as they do. Silence, in service of the story, is construed as agreement or approval. That is a profound error.
And so many just throw up their hands and decide they cannot live with the hypocrisy and do not want to be in such a hostile environment that is too counter to the Chronicles they love. -- one where Aslan doesn't say a word about same sex relationships and has A LOT to say about compassion, mercy and love. Readers and writers do not want to give the appearance, even by their mere presence, that they condone the condemners. When you can't even go to the first page of fanfiction.net and not be triggered by story summaries, it's easier to just leave and these compassionate, loving people take their stories and wonderful reviews with them.
I'm sorry it's happened to wonderful people who I love and respect and at this point only sheer cussedness in refusing to be driven out keeps me there. There aren't many of us left.
(no subject)
no subject
The sniping was horrible -- mean-spirited, cowardly, malicious and essentially dishonest (i.e. by positioning itself as a review but being in fact an attack on your values, and also an attempt to censor a moral position from the entire site). And in being all that, it also shows her as just fundamentally wrong about what really matters in human relationships.
I'm so sorry that you have been ground down by this paltry, grimy stuff. And many, many people enormously value your work -- it's great gift to us all.