![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
To E, Part 3
Gosh, this makes me want to pick up Harold and Morgan again! Thanks so much, E. A couple of things, I guess, other than a humongous thank you.
Thank you for the comment on consistency as I see some definite inconsistencies, especially with Morgan and Lucy. My ideas on Lucy really firmed up after working on Palace Guard and some of TQSiT, so she’s much more developed in H&M. Your comment about the quote at the beginning of the Foolish Faun chapter from PC and then the tale itself are indeed going to precisely the deux ex machine point. I developed it further in TPG with Lucy excpecting Aslan to save her. It’s actually sort of interesting to think about – for a 100 years, they were probably wishing Aslan would save them and he doesn’t. The despair during the rise of the Telmarines would have been even greater. It would be hard to see how Narnians could assume Aslan would fix everything when he didn’t for so long. Lucy, on the other hand, doesn’t have that experience of waiting and disappointed expectation.
The Bahamas were exactly what I was thinking of as off shore tax havens. The idea of bias and favoritism in corporate and tax policy is well established – the benefit of home ownership in the US, or sin taxes on soda pop, deductions for dependents. I just read on article on how high tariffs on Chinese made ironing boards have kept the only American manufacturer of ironing boards in business. As you point, economic espionage and protest were rampant during WW2 – I’m reading now how the French sent all their bad wine to the Wehrmacht during the occupation. Unfortunately, I’m really rubbish at finance and numbers so I was just making up so much of this as I go along and now I am stuck with something I know nothing about as people said they kinda sort liked how Edmund and Morgan had something they were doing together that was important apart from Tru Lurve and/or hawt, sweaty timez.
I have, at the moment, given the barest thought to the organization of the banking syndicates, except to assume that the individual houses operate like a Lloyd’s of London, who are independent and competitors but also work cooperatively to pool and share risk. I had thought that for whatever reason that Narrowhaven ends up being a sort of financial capital, possibly because of very lax oversight by Narnia. Were I to go on in H&M, a lot of this would have to be explored and I did envision a storyline involving what it means politically that a Linch banker has aligned with the Narnian monarchy.
OK, last, about the princesses. When I wrote those lines about manipulating and being manipulated, I had not even thought the final chapter of the story would happen. It was going to end with Jina in the corset. Ha. But, having gone down that road, I have been thinking a lot about women using their sexuality for advancement on the one hand and how embracing of personal sexuality is a tool of empowerment. As I was working on TQSiT, some of the “Tarkheenas” of the story really gave me pause. The men of that milieu were treating women as toys. Why was it bad that these powerful women – politicians, power brokers, socialists, and newspaper owners -- were playing a man’s game in a very male dominated world, and succeeding at it? I found something grudgingly admiring in their seizing of what they wanted. That notion of seeing, wanting, looking, and maybe acting (but thinking, refraining from acting, and making good choices) ended up finding its way into Susan’s characterization as I wanted to attack the fandom convention of Susan’s frequent sexual victimization.
Harold and Morgan
(Anonymous) 2010-06-26 04:15 am (UTC)(link)Evil environmental finance analyst, mostly a lady wants to know!
AEE
Re: Harold and Morgan
There is a division in those who read my stuff, with some only reading one side of it, and others reading both. The general consensus among those who read both is that the Spare Oom/TSG side is better. Which then leads me to the problem of the end of Part 2. Some might think Part 2 is better, but if so, then that's really bad given what has happened to the readers. I had a HUGE drop in hits in the last third of the story, submitted reviews fell by half over the previous highs, long time reviewers disappeared, and it ended up being fav'd 25% less than Part 1. With the exception of one temporary blip, reviews and hits per chapter have fallen steadily since March. So, there's a message there, yeah? And I have to decide whether I want to figure out what it is, and whether I care. Again, I don't like the woe is me bit but in real life writing, I'd be horrified by that sort of declining performance and it would call for a drastic course correction. I feel it's really irresponsible to do anything other than stop and look really hard at this before committing to anything further.
Re: Harold and Morgan
(Anonymous) 2010-06-26 11:38 am (UTC)(link)Have you considered whether or not the readership is down is directly due to the audience on ff? I'm a reader, not a writer, but it seems to me like the field is dominated by late teens early twenty folks who might not have the experience or the education to understand, much less appreciate, the depth and the subtelties to the historical background and themes you're writing about.
In short, keep going, and save me from the duldrems of bad teeny bopper fanfic ;)
BTW, I'm in my late 30's with a PhD in Foreign Affairs, and I've read textbooks that aren't this insightful to WWII Britain.
AEE
Re: Harold and Morgan
I already know that the audience for my stuff is small, with the TSG audience even smaller than the Narnia based stuff. I knew that when I started in March 2009 -- with references to polygamist evolutionists in Chapter 1, Dun Scotus and dinosaurs in Chapter 2, and female genital mutilation by chapter 3, yeah, not the typical audience. Overall and as far as I know, there are maybe a handful of high schoolers and, again, based on self-reporting, a few more who are in college age. I assume most of the rest are out of school.
I am incredibly grateful and shocked that I found the readership that I did. If I had been more savvy, it might have been better to have just gone straight to the LJ communities, though there really aren't many serialized stories over here -- Bedlamsbard being the exception I can think of in Narnia fandom. The fact that it found the readership that it did is why I am pausing. If I had never gone beyond say 100 hits and ten reviews a chapter, I'd be thrilled. But that's not what happened. I had not really studied the numbers until last night and the precipitous decline is, in fact even worse than I had thought. So, thanks for the thoughts. Self critique is not comfortable but it is warranted here methinks.
Re: Harold and Morgan
Rth, what you write is different, and that's what makes it so fantastic.But you already know how I feel about that. And I completely agree with AEE's above comment about the readership on ff.net (and this is so hypocritical, coming from me...): most of the people on that site don't venture into stories of this depth or intensity or interest. I know that, when I start to read one of your stories, I'd better be ready to hop onto Wikipedia and educate myself, and I love that. Your stories are rich and interesting and terribly wonderful. Thank you.
Re: Harold and Morgan
no subject
Recently, I sat down and re-read TSG again (from the hard copies I printed for my trip last year) and skimmed the earlier chapters of TQSiT. And as I went back to the earlier stuff, I did find Part 1 more enjoyable than Part 2.
Part 1 was fun and while it was certainly an enjoyable educational experience (for me, anyway), what I liked about it over Part 2 was the lightheartedness of it (questionable archaeologists, animals, and intellectual & philosophical conversations between persons of different backgrounds) over the drama, intrigue and serious backdrop of the War in Part 2.
Maybe Part 2 did get a bit heavy, though I didn't find it harder to plough through than Part 1. Maybe because it delved more deeply into the reality of what went on with the War and many of us know some historical background about it that for me, didn't require as many re-readings as Part 1 (when it was more about zoology).
As for Susan and Tebbitt at the end of Part 2... I liked reading about it though it wasn't something I cared for much, which is odd. You've been hinting at their relationship through many chapters and we all knew it was coming, and even I enjoyed the not-a-chapter insert where you began to explore the feelings they had for each other. I can't quite pinpoint what it is exactly that didn't sit as well with me as the rest of the story. To some extent, I think because even though I was expecting it, the scenes in the lift and the closet seemed somehow... rushed? Not sure if that's the right word for it. Or that it was more of extra "filler" (also not the right word) after the seriousness and depth of the rest of Part 2. While I'm happy that you did Go There with Susan and Tebbitt, it didn't mesh as well with all the other chapters that came before it. It felt a bit like I could take it or leave it.
... Or maybe it would have worked better if we saw more of their relationship in Part 3, when Susan's "older".
So these are the thoughts that have been in head when taking Parts 1 and 2 together and trying to sort out my overall feelings on both. I wonder a bit if my own thoughts here mirror those of your readers, and why the reviews have dropped with the more recent chapters.
Don't take this as harsh criticism or anything, Ruth. Truly, I do so very much enjoy your work and LOVE reading all of it! If I didn't appreciate the time, effort and research that you so cleverly include in your writing, then I too would have become one of your lost readers.
no subject
This is not harsh criticism my friend. Harsh criticism in my real life is in the nature of my colleague saying "This is crap and I have to rewrite it," and in professional fiction it is the "I don't care that you love that part, if you don't find a better ending, we're not printing it." No, what has me going AHHHH is that RTH MISJUDGES AGAIN! I have been reading feedback very, very closely this past few months and in it I did notice a certain increasing equivocation and omission. I had assumed precisely the opposite -- that readers who otherwise liked my stuff weren't comfortable with the Susan/Tebbitt content and were trying to say something nice rather than nothing at all. I have assumed that it wasn't that there was too little of said content or that it wasn't developed adequately, but that it was there at all.
Based upon what I have assumed were pretty serious misgivings of this nature from long time readers whose opinions I value, I have had really grave concerns about Part 3 given where I had always intended to take the story. In other words, if people I hoped to maintain reader relationships with through Part 3 didn't like the sharpened focus upon a Susan/OC ship at the end of Part 2, this meant real trouble for Part 3 once I had aged the characters enough that I could explore these things further.
OK time for Saturday errands where I will fortunately be alone in the car for some extended conversation with me, myself, and I. Thank gawd for the bluetooth in my ear.
no subject
At any rate, I don't know where you are going to go exactly with Part 3 yet, but I think I'd be fine reading of Susan/Tebbitt there. I suspect it's part of that whole "older" issue I mentioned above, because right now, even though I know Susan is older (than Tebbitt), I can't seem to get rid of the visual in my head of her being 15. Visuals here are not helping me here at all!
And yet, if Susan and Tebbitt had continued in the not-a-chapter, that would have worked for me! There's something about the whole setup in that went well for me when I read it, so it's not as if I'm against their relationship at all. Hmm. Must ponder some more about it.
I wonder if I just need to re-read the later chapters for things to sink in and make more sense (to me) clearly. I used to re-read the chapters at least once over but I had stopped at some point for some reason I can't even come up with at the moment.
no subject
no subject
And one last thing I want to mention before I run off this morning: Like min below, I just want to say that I'll continue to be one of your "read everything" readers. Your stories, characters and plot really have been refreshing and a pleasure to read. As one of your non-teen fans, I've truly enjoyed the more adult nature of your stories, whether it's stuff you posted on FF.net, comment fic, or comment fic to comment fic. :-)
no subject
As you doubtless already know, I'm one of your "read everything" readers, and to be perverse, I like your Golden Age stories just as much (and in some parts, better) than your Spare Oom writings. If I had to nail down my preference between Part 1 and Part 2 of TSG, I'd probably also say Part 1, but not for the reasons you might expect.
I like the light-heartedness of some of the interactions, which thematically didn't fit quite so well with Part 2. As a general comment, you write the witty repartee very well indeed, and there's a bit more scope for that in Part 1. We also saw more of the 'genuine' Good Beasts in Part 1 than Part 2 (where they were more part of the cypher, than themselves), and that, too, was part of the attraction.
I think for me, it's simply that I don't channel Susan nearly as well as the other Friends, so I find it harder to empathise with her character than any of the others. That said, I prefer your characterisation of Susan to any other that I have read. I am absolutely delighted with the way that you've thrown many of the fanon conventions about Susan (and to a lesser extent, the other Pevensies) straight out the window. The stupid, vapid, (sometimes) victimised, party-girl annoys the crap out of me, and I'm not a fan of Suspian either.
I don't have a problem with Susan/Tebbitt, nor with anyone else/OC, provided the OC is well-written and fits the tale (which yours undoubtedly are and do). Yes, there was an initial 'squick' factor, given the age difference, but it didn't become a big problem, particularly given the fact that you had Susan take ownership of herself, her desires and emotions. I can see how this might become a hot button for some of the readership, but I'm delighted to find an assertive women, not a rag doll. Intellectually, I do understand the 'morality' complaint - I think it's rubbish, myself, but I won't answer for anyone else.
Maybe it's partially the subject matter. Issues like the Holocaust and the nastiness of wartime intelligence work still cause quite a lot of squirm factor seventy years after the event, and even fictionalised, I can see that it may be uncomfortable for some. Is it just that it's not as 'fluffy' as Part 1? I don't know - I wish I had a better handle on it, and could give you better insight, but I haven't. Don't know whether there's anything here that's of any use to you, but that's my thoughts...
At any rate, I'm here for the long haul, and I do hope that you decide to continue.
: )
no subject
no subject
I'm one of the fans you've held onto for the whole of TQSiT. I rec' your work to people I know who like complex, intelligent stories.
I'm also a lurker, so you probably won't be hearing much from me, but keep up the good work.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Oh, and footnotes. Dang, I love footnotes. Are there a lot of stories of this kind in Narnia fandom? I've only ever read, like, 3 Narnia stories or something.
p.s. Can i friend you?
no subject
In any event, Part 1 that you just read -- yes, Peter can come across as being "perfect" except that he's really missed the boat, Aslan is really frustrated (to the extent a deity can be frustrated) and the man's in for angst wallowing before he figures it out. I've written recently to E that the Peter of this vision is very much a reaction to the Angry!Stupid! Peter of the Prince Caspian film and resulting fandom - -WAAAAAH, I'm not King anymore, this WORLD SUX, stomp stomp. I appreciate AU characterization as much as the next person but I really don't see that in the Prince Caspian book, so this is very much a reaction to all that angst. I like to think that the stories are really low on overall angst.
Thanks for saying that about the voices. I do tend to jump around a bit, though in Part 2 it is, until the very end, nearly all Susan with some Peter and Edmund tossed in. Part 2 is a HARD and demanding story to read with its multi-layered story telling. Most readers picked up the "code" about the same time that Peter does and really not knowing the Narnia characters doesn't matter because it is NOT the true canon Narnia characters in the story -- it's a conceit, a made up story, to get by the censors and once, as revealed in chapter 3, the gig is up (around chapter 19), the dual action disappears entirely. It's actually better to not know that Sallowpad was a Raven who appears once in Horse and His Boy or who Prince Cor is -- the characters that appear here are not the characters of the Chronicles.
As it turns out, I was glad to have that option of telling the really dodgy bits in Narnia code where I was dealing with real people and real events. It became a form of historical fiction and I was glad to be able to use the Narnia bits to distance myself from real Congresswomen, ambassadors, generals, and newspaper heiresses and reporters.
No, this is not a typical Narnia fic by a long shot. I'm an adult, writing adults, for adults. This means a lot of things, including the fact that I include adult content and thematic elements (e.g., premarital and extra marital sex, female cutting, moral use of power in pursuit of national goals, euthanasia, genocide) and I take some grief for some of those things -- especially the sexual content (see above). And Part 2 is demanding enough that it takes a certain reader to even stay with it -- footnotes indeed. You have to be interested in the War and in the things the British did to engage the Americans in the War to even be interested in the story. Plenty of readers are interested in something more fun and less taxing.
So thanks, and I love to hear from folks! Friending commences.
no subject
when it comes to the Narnia films I am just so filled with overemotional nostalgia i am completely incapable of being critical. ordinarily i critise & analyse every aspect of movies and TV till it drives people crazy, but with Narnia I just weep all the way through -- the first one, anyway. it was ridiculous. thankfully i have heard i am not alone in this, however.
i'm not finding susan's code too difficult once i get into it. i do want more edmund though -- edmund was always my favourite (another reason why i like the movies -- i think the guy who plays him does it in a very sarcastic and sly way, coming across as far more intelligent than magnificent Etonian Peter).
well, i love history so this is definitely the story for me i guess. do you read much historical fiction? i don't in general, but i am a big Dorothy Dunnett fan. is Narnia fic generally quite childish, then? that surprises me, because in most fandoms most of the fic is adult oriented. most of the fic that isn't 12 year olds writing flowery & poorly-spelled romance, that is. i'd have thought a lot of people would want to write about the High Kings & Queens, etc.
no subject
It felt very odd to consider even the possibility of lusting after actors who seemed so very, very young and indeed my visuals, to the extent I have them, come from the great Peter O'Toole films of the late 60s, early 70's, The Lion In Winter (roaming dogs! chickens! Timothy Dalton and Anthony Hopkins!); Lawrence of Arabia, and Beckett (O'Toole and Burton).
Is Narnia fic childish... Gosh, I dunno. You can look at fanfiction.net and come to your own conclusions. To paraphrase Tolkien, I don't read those works and those writers don't read mine. The undisputed BNF is Elecktrum. Other popular writers who I read or used to read include: Ilysia, Animus_Wymris, Lassiterfic, Be_themoon, Almyra, Francienyc, and Andi Horton. Other very, very popular writers include Lirenel, Tonzura123, and Sentimental Star. None of these writers are 12 years old and the work spans gen to OC romance. A popular LJ/dreamwidth author is Bedlamsbard.
Thanks again! I hope you'll consider leaving a review at some point!
no subject
no subject
no subject
I wonder if/how many people in the administration are in fandom at all...
no subject
"I am a copyright infringer, like my father before me."
"The infringement is strong with this one."
"Adventure! Excitement! A copyright lawyer craves not these things."
"Infringers will be with you... always."
no subject
no subject